More dirty secrets are spilling out from the Clinton camp. We’ve written previously about the dubious affiliations of Hillary’s closest advisor, Huma Abedin; that her family is connected to radical group the Muslim Brotherhood.
We also know that Huma Abedin has gone to bat for her husband, disgraced New York politician Anthony Wiener. She’s supported him when he ran for mayor, even though he continued in elicit communication with strangers online (There must be something about liberal women supporting and defending unfaithful men, right Hillary?).
Now we are learning how deep Abedin’s Islamist roots are. She’s not one of the many, moderate, freedom-loving Muslims that live in the Western world. It seems she is more in line with the radical, oppressive Islam that has the Middle East in an icy grip.
From the New York Post:
Hillary Clinton’s top campaign aide, and the woman who might be the future White House chief of staff to the first female US president, for a decade edited a radical Muslim publication that opposed women’s rights and blamed the US for 9/11.
Abedin personally helped edit articles for this radical publication. She even went as far as to contradict her future boss, Hillary, way back in 1996.
One of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign website is her support for the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, when she famously declared, “Women’s rights are human rights.”…
However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 event, as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-first lady Clinton.
The article criticized single moms, working moms, and gay couples, claiming they weren’t real families. It also stated that the woman’s lib movement ushered in revealing clothing for women that “directly translates into unwanted results of sexual promiscuity and irresponsibility and indirectly promote violence against women.” Meaning that it’s a woman’s fault for getting raped.
The publication spoke out against woman’s rights, including their right to hold jobs in an open workplace. It asserted that a woman’s only true role is in procreation and child-raising. Such backwards, close-minded views are certainly the antithesis of the liberal movement and everything Hillary Clinton claims to stand for.
So why did she appoint Abedin to be her closest aid? Some say that should she be elected, Hillary would make Abedin her White House chief of staff. So Hillary is willing to hand over the White House to a woman who holds such toxic views? Do you want someone like that running our government?
Either Hillary really does have the worst judgment of any politician we have ever seen, or she willfully ignored the red flags in Abedin’s past to appear progressive. She chose a radical Muslim woman to serve and work with her for years, so she could look open minded and appeasing.
Instead she set up a successor that would plunge American women into the dark ages. Make no mistake, after Hillary’s time in the sun is over, Huma will be quick to swoop in and take control.
Don’t believe the liberal hype machine when they say Hillary Clinton is for women. She’s for herself. She continues to lie to women and minorities, pretending to be on their side, while empowering ideology and forces that suppress them.
Source: NY Post