The new round of emails released by Wikileaks reveals even more shocking details about the corruption of the Democratic Party and their front runner, Hillary Clinton.
What’s more, new leaks are revealing the extent of collusion between her political campaign and the mainstream media.
We’ve known for years that some of the largest news outlets skew left. This has been especially true in the last twenty years of politica coverage. News channels, papers, and websites have spun stories to malign republican leaders and prop up democratic ones.
It’s always been clear that these outlets favor protecting the liberal agenda over presenting the unaltered facts.
But to the extent they have violated their own journalistic ethics is staggering. New leaked emails show that some media outlets are just PR arms for the Clinton’s.
The New York Times provided questions to former President Bill Clinton before an interview with Nicholas Kristoff, the Wikileaks release of Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta emails has revealed.
In an email sent to Podesta and several others, the Clinton Foundation’s Director of Foreign Policy Ami Desai requests feedback on answers to “questions they sent that are related to international issues”…
In the email, Desai reveals four questions on international issues that Kristof planned to ask Clinton. The first question is framed by crediting Clinton with coming within a “whisker from a Middle East peace deal.” Three of the questions are followed by proposed answers in all CAPS from the Clinton Foundation.
For those of you unaware, you don’t give a person the questions before the interview, especially a politician addressing international affairs. This gives them a chance to prepare, with loaded answers.
No, a real interview challenged the person, in this case Bill Clinton, to speak honestly. The fact that the Times sent ahead questions to be vetted by Clinton’s people reveal the interview was rigged from the start.
Notice how the questions weren’t even addressed to Bill. He needed a team of cronies to craft the answers, so there was no chance he’d say anything wrong or embarrassing. You’d think an accomplished, former president would be competent enough to answer questions on his own.
The New York Times had no interest presenting facts, but simply providing a platform for the Clinton Foundation to spew their agenda and ideals.
This is what our modern media has become: a public relations arm for Clinton and the democrats. They are no longer interested in uncovering the truth, and allowing the American people to make up their minds.
They are only interested in telling you what to believe, so you will be easier to control.
Are you going to put up with that?
It’s time we pull our support from such rags as The New York Times. Any outlet that blatantly lies to us does not deserve our time, attention, or money.