It’s becoming more and more evident that the left-wing media are favoring Clinton. So disgusting it has become that they don’t even try to hide it anymore. News outlets such as CNN, HuffPo, and the New York Times openly deny facts to prop up their candidate and tarnish Donald Trump.
The latest scandal is almost laughable. While there is clear proof that Hillary Clinton’s people are in bed with Russia, the New York Times is trying to link Trump with the nation. This despite any hard evidence.
This comes in the wake of the DNC email leak, when the Democratic Party was embarrassed by the release of over 20,000 emails to the public, exposing their corruption and hypocrisy. The liberal media, terrified by what this leak could reveal, tried to shift focus to a made-up narrative that the Russians hacked the emails in order to help Donald Trump.
This was completely fabricated. It was just a ruse to keep you, the American citizen, away from the real story: the Democrats’ massive corruption.
But it isn’t going away, so the media is pushing their deceptive narrative even further.
The New York Times reports that Trump’s campaign chair, Paul Manafort, is listed in a “secret ledger” showing payments from the former, Russia-friendly, Ukrainian government. The fact that Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair, left-wing George Soros agent John Podesta, helped a Russian government-linked company bag $35 million — an actual, bigger scandal — is ignored.
Now why would a newspaper—tasked with uncover the facts and only the facts—push a weak story about Trump’s aid, while ignoring the real link between Hillary and Russia? Could it be that they are so grossly biased that they can’t even see the facts right in front of them?
First of all, it is not clear what the Times story shows, because the Times spends so much time undermining its own case.
Keep in mind that Trump’s opponent not only pushed the “reset” button with the Putin regime in an effort to establish closer ties, but also presided over a nuclear disarmament treaty that slashed America’s nuclear arsenal while leaving Russia’s weapons largely intact; abandoned American missile defense programs in Europe to appease Russia, undercutting our Eastern European allies in the process; allowed a Putin-controlled company to acquire 20% of U.S. supplies of uranium, after a timely donation to the Clinton Foundation; and encouraged American tech companies to invest in a Russian project that was likely used to improve Russian defense and espionage.
So we’re supposed to believe Trump’s people are working for the Russians, while Hillary has a long history of directly helping them? Hillary has single-handedly aided a nation that is still antagonistic towards America. She is enriching a potential enemy—to our detriment!
Why are people supporting her again?
What can you say about a newspaper that is so blatantly dishonest? If they were still printing it, it would at least be useful as birdcage lining. But perhaps this is why newspapers have been dying over the last ten years. People have lost faith in them and stopped reading because of dishonest reporting.
Let’s all send a message to the Times and refuse to support this biased rag.