Every time one of Brett Kavanaugh’s accusers becomes discredited, the Democrats release a new one from their holding pen.
Odd coincidence, right?
After Blasey Ford’s story fell apart, new accuser Debroah Ramirez appeared out of thin air to make claims so outrageous that even the New York Times wouldn’t publish them.
After Ramirez and Blasey Ford were out of the picture, it was only a matter of time before a new accuser magically surfaced.
But the latest woman to come forward against Kavanaugh is making accusations that are more depraved than any of the past allegations made against him.
Julie Swetnick claims that she knew Kavanaugh in high school, and that he and his friends spiked the drinks of girls at parties in the 80’s…and then gang-raped them.
I get that the Democrats are dying to stop Kavanaugh, but this time they’ve gone too far.
Kavanaugh called Swetnick’s claims “ridiculous and from the Twilight Zone.”
“I don’t know who this is and this never happened,” said Kavanaugh.
At this point, due process does not apply to Kavanaugh. The mere allegation that he is a rapist will follow him for the rest of his life.
But Swetnick’s story has more holes than Swiss cheese, just like Kavanaugh’s past accusers. Twitter users pointed out several glaring inconsistencies in Swetnick’s story.
What?!?
"Ms. Swetnick grew up in Montgomery County, Md., graduating from Gaithersburg High School in 1980 before attending college"
She was attending high-school parties where gang rapes occurred while a college student? https://t.co/7mSt80OR2Z
— John McCormack (@McCormackJohn) September 26, 2018
How could Sweatnick have been raped at a “high school party” when she was not in high school at the time she’s claiming this happened?
Another user pointed out that if Swetnick’s claims are true there should be dozens of “accomplices”.
John's underselling things. If true, there are dozens of *accomplices* to gang rape. Maybe hundreds. https://t.co/w9omWTibcf
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) September 26, 2018
And perhaps the most glaring inconsistency of all is the fact that Swetnick is claiming she witnessed girls being raped at these parties but said nothing and eventually became a victim herself. How does this make sense?
One obvious question about this account: Why would she constantly attend parties where she believed girls were being gang-raped?https://t.co/OCIduRVgt6
— Rich Lowry (@RichLowry) September 26, 2018
Someone needs to check Swetnick’s bank account and monitor it for recent payments deposited by the DNC. While we’re at it, monitor Ramirez and Blasey Ford’s accounts as well.
The Democrats seem convinced Swetnick is telling the truth because she signed her statement under penalty of perjury, but this just means that when she is undoubtedly proven to be committing perjury she will face harsh punishment.
Additionally, Swetnick’s attorney is none other than creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti, a man currently being sued for $10 million dollars for failing to pay one of his attorney’s.
Republicans need to put this madness to an end and confirm Kavanaugh immediately. Do you agree?
